Trust Centre
The honest version.
This is where we write down what we actually do with your data, including the parts that don't flatter us. If we can't keep a promise yet, it gets written here before it gets written anywhere else.Nothing here trains a model
Your archive exports in full
Requests: 30-day response
Nothing you write trains a model. Requests answered in 30 days.
IWhere it sits
How a memory is kept
Three places. One of them we can read.
The dashed box is the part that matters. Everything inside it is text our application can open. That's the honest shape of this product today. We'd rather draw it than bury it.IIEncryption
Encryption posture
What's encrypted, what isn't, and what that means.
This table used to say AES-256 on five of its six rows. We read the code. It wasn't true. So the rows now say what the code says instead. Encryption our hosting provider applies underneath is a separate question, and it has a separate answer. We'll publish that one when it's confirmed.Model posture
Your memory isn't training fuel.
Sub-processors
The companies that help us run Confinity.
We keep this list short on purpose. Every vendor here has a signed data-processing agreement. The list gets reviewed each quarter. Account holders hear from us by email before a new vendor that touches your content joins it.Data residency
One line on this page is under re-verification.
Data-subject requests
See it, export it, or delete it.
Two routes. Same team at the end of both. Neither is the slow one.Frequently asked
Straight answers. Including the awkward ones.
IIIThe ledger
Written down before the billboard
What we keep, and what we can't claim yet.
This register is the whole point of the page. It holds the promises we keep today, alongside the ones written down here first precisely because we can’t keep them yet. That second half is harder to publish. It’s also the half worth reading. When a “not yet” becomes real, it moves up, carrying the date it happened.Reviewed in the open
We don't grade our own homework. Somebody else marks it.
Our resurfacing and writing-assist posture is read under the memory & machine-ethics collaboration with the Oxford University AI Society. Our legacy-transfer terms go to the Oxford Law Society's digital-legacy working group. Their findings get published whether or not they flatter us. First outputs are in progress for the 2026–27 academic year.More in the Trust Centre